Timeline
This module is designed to be completed in approximately
23 class sessions. Class sessions are intended to be 45 minutes
in length. Timing may need to be adjusted for class sessions
of different length.
PERIOD
|
FOCUS
MODEL
COMPONENT
(for teachers)
|
INFORMED
DESIGN LOOP COMPONENT
(for students)
|
ACTIVITY
|
|
Focus Discussion on Problem Context
Organize for Informed Design
|
Clarify
Design Specifications and Constraints |
Begin
Discussion the Module Overview
Discussion of KSB #1 - Informed Design Cycle
|
|
Coordinate Student Progress |
Research
and Investigation |
•
Conduct KSB #2 (Alternative Energy Sources)
•
Conduct KSB #3 (Basic
Electronic Circuit Relations)
•
Conduct KSB #4 (Circuit Board and Package Design) |
|
Coordinate Student Progress |
Generate
Alternative Designs |
Create
Models of Alternative Design Solutions
Select
and Defend Choice
of Preferred Alternative
Fabricate and Assembly of the System
Testing of the System
|
|
Unite Class Thinking Accomplished
Sum Up Progress on Learning
Goals
|
Test
and Evaluate Safety Light System |
Prepare
Design Report
Class
Presentations of Methods and Results
|
Periods
1-3: Focusing discussion on the problem context
The problem. In order to focus and engage your students,
discuss with class that among the common power sources, primary
batteries are the most expensive. For example, AAA cell's
energy cost is about $890 per kWh, which is 8900 times more
expensive than the cost of electricity we pay at home. In
reality, the actual cost is even higher if the environmental
cost is properly considered. Ask the following question: "
How can we design a safety light system that has minimum environmental
impact?" After providing " wait time" for the
class to think, elicit and record on the discussion board
a number of possible ideas and briefly examine the feasibility
of each with the class. If the class fail to mention solar
photovoltaic charging as a way to power the safety light system,
lead to that direction by asking, for example, how do astronuts
generate electricity in the space shuttle. They should respond
with such examples as solar cells, fuel cells, etc.
Tell the class that they are going to concentrate on solar
cells because they are the cheapest and have the least environment
impact.
The challenge.
Redirect students to the WEBTECH pages. As you go through
the contents together, present the challenge in a manner that
will motivate them. Discuss briefly the What You Will Do,
Problem Context, and Materials Needed sections.

Period
1 -3: Organizing for Informed Design
Informed design. Elicit from students what they know
about good design and who engages in design. Ask for examples
of good design and poor design. Tell the class that completing
a series of KSBs will help prepare them for addressing the
design challenge they face. Then introduce KSB #1:The Informed
Design Cycle and provide time to read it. The information
in KSB#1 should be referred to often as groups work on the
design challenge. The Informed Design Cycle loop can be particularly
useful to the students as they chart their progress using
a Design Journal (or Design Activity Folio). Like professional
engineers, they will find themselves using the loop in an
iterative way rather than in a linear way.
Discuss the informed design cycle and stress that although
design is normally informed by the designers current
knowledge, completion typically requires access to new knowledge.
Discuss the need to research what solutions exist to solve
this design challenge, and how reaching an optimal design
solution requires meeting specifications, working within constraints,
and making trade-offs.

Student requirements.
Discuss the student requirements after determining whether
you will expect the students to use the Design Activity Folio
(DAF) or the Design Journal. Help students see that either
of these devices allows them to document progress as they
complete literature searches, factor investigations, and Knowledge
and Skill Builders (KSBs). Describe the requirement that each
student submit a Design Report and each group make a class
presentation at the conclusion of the module. Explain that
the report and the presentation will be based on information
recorded in the Design Journal or DAF. Alert them that the
presentations should be multimedia and should detail their
design process and results. Help them see that such a presentation
summarizes work completed in researching, collecting, and
analyzing data; developing models; improving designs; and
making refinements.
Describe multiple forms of media (for example, powerpoint
presentations, color overheads, videos, computer animation)
that they might use to enhance their presentations. Assure
them that when classmates ask probing questions and challenge
group findings at the end of presentations, they are mirroring
proceedings that are common at science conferences.
Assigning groups.
Talk with some of the students ahead of time to see how experienced
they are at working in cooperative groups. Assign small working
groups; three is ideal. Monitor groups throughout the module.

Periods
4-16: Coordinating student progress
Coordinate work by individuals.
Plan opportunities within this module for students to revisit
their initial understandings by providing experiences with
new phenomena that contradict their stated perceptions. Unless
individuals get to actively process such contradictions, they
may fail to grasp the new concepts and then may revert to
their preconceptions. Help individual students make the connection
between carefully documenting information as they proceed
and well-written reports and presentations at the end. Note
that a student displaying unacceptable behavior may be doing
so because other members of the group do not value what he/she
says. Get to know the strengths
of such a student and try assigning roles for all members
of his or her group. Give thestudent a role that features
a personal strength and inform the group ahead of time that
this person is known to do that task well.
As the work becomes more technical and cerebral, some students
will begin to complain that they are doing all the work while
others loaf. Citing examples from your own experience, explain
to such individuals that the best way to learn something is
to teach it to others. Remind the group that it is essential
that all members of a cooperative group understand all ideas
and steps along the way. Conduct frequent oral checks to see
that each student has adequate understanding before the group
moves on in its work.
Sharing.
Convene the large group one or more times to share results
of individual and group investigations. Invite students to
listen critically to one another and facilitate a discussion
of how this knowledge can be used to inform their design of
a safetylight system. Continue to work as a facilitator as
students work in their groups to create alternative designs.
Check to see that each group understands that its solution
must address the specifications and constraints. Remind each
group to make decisions and select design components based
upon their investigations and their understanding and application
of MST principles. You might want the groups to develop a
rating system to determine which alternative design is preferred.
Planning and constructing.
Continue to work as a facilitator as groups select their
preferred alternative and develop plans for construction.
Facilitate a discussion of trade-offs that are made in the
search for an optimal design solution. Encourage groups to
identify and model functional design elements and construct
their working prototype.
Testing.
Bring students together as a large group and discuss ways
in which each group might test their design. Facilitate small
group development of testing and evaluation procedures. Bring
the entire group together to compare results. Encourage student
groups to carefully review the work of other groups to gain
ideas that might inform a redesign. When redesign is discussed,
continue to direct students attention to how the understanding
and application of MST concepts can guide improvements.

Periods
17-19:
Summing up progress on the learning goals Design report. The
reports are one of the major opportunities for you to determine
whether individuals have attained your goals for this module.
Continue to work as a facilitator as groups document their
progress and share results. Explain that each student must
submit a Design Report. Assist individuals in structuring
and writing their Design Reports. The Design Report should
include a discussion of redesign with justifications for the
redesign decisions. Provide students with the Design Report
guidelines. As you introduced this mod you told students that
careful documentation in the Design Journal leads to a well-written
final report later on. For individuals who have
trouble writing, check their documentation frequently along
the way to ensure that they will have a source of information
adequate to generate a report.
Periods
20-23:
Group presentations. Discuss with the class what is considered
proper and expected deportment during group presentations.
Address the need to use a variety of media to support the
presentation. Review and distribute the presentation guidelines
|