next up previous
Next: Dynamics - ``Things that Up: Introduction to the Finite Previous: Structure Types and Choice

Feature Suppression and Meshing - ``The Black Art of Good Analysis''

 

Meshing/Model Creation
Process of creating discretized model of solid  composed of  finite elements.

Suppression of minor complex feature, geometric simplification for affordable analysis
It is often necessary to remove minor complexities from the CAD geometry before conducting analysis e.g. threads need to be suppressed, small protrusions that are not
carrying load need to be removed. Another major simplification that needs to be recognized and used is presence of any symmetry. If the geometry is symmetric about any plane
and the loading is either symmetric or anti-symmetric (see discussion under Boundary Condition), then only half the body needs to be modelled with appropriate boundary
condition.

Major simplification
The 3D solid is reduced to an assemblage of rods, beams, shells(2D) features using the criteria defined in the previous lectures.
 
 

Meshing

Manual Meshing
In this technique the analyst manually definess nodes and elements. Rarely done now except for the most complex cases where automatic meshing software fails or the analyst wants better quality of mesh.

Automatic Meshing

Two general techniques -- mapped meshes  and  free meshes.

Mapped Meshing

This is achieved by splitting oppposite boundary edges(2D)/faces(3D) into a set number of segments and connecting them with lines -- with the intersections defining interior nodes. Thus this requires the body to have a regular number (3 or 4) "edges" and equal number of nodes on opposite edges. This may be too restrictive for complex geometry or the presence of holes but usually produces good mesh quality  (well shaped elements) when they work.
 

Free Meshing (method implemented in Pro/E mesh module)

In this method the  surface is covered with elements of defined shape (triangles/quads, tetrahedra/hexahedra) using complex geometric algorithms. These algorithms attempt to cover the entire area/volume with well shaped elements. Such algoriithms usually work with triangles for 2D or tetrahedra for 3D. Free meshing will allow local control of element sizes.

Two popular algorithms for free meshing:

    1.maximum area plane method:  Suitable for complex slanted surfaces. A projection(shadow) of the surface onto a flat plane is meshed.

    2.parametric space method: Every surface in Pro/E(CAD) is represented parametrically as F(s,t) with s, t ranging from 0 to 1. In this meshing
      technique nodes are generated by splitting each parameter into intervals e.g. s=[0,0.1,0.2, ...,1.0] t=[0,0.1,0.2,...,1.0] and taking all combination to
      produce node coordinates i.e. 100 node coordinates will be  at  {(0,0), (0,0.1),(0,0.2)....,(1.0,1.0)}. These are then mapped to the physical coordinates
      and connected to get a mesh.

 

Boundary Conditions
Types of boundary conditions

    1.Displacement: constraints usually are meshed as zero displacement/immovable.
    2.Pressure: distributed loads
    3.Force
    4.Symmetry and Antisymmetry

 
If geometry is symmetric and loading is symmetric we can model only half the body and impose symmetry BC on the displacement as below:
Symmetry BC
 
 

Plane of symm. X Y Z RX RY RZ
X=0 0 F F F 0 0
Y=0 F 0 F 0 F 0
Z=0 F F 0 0 F 0
F=> Free, RX,RY,RZ => rotations Notice NO out of plane motion allowed for any point on plane of symmetry.

If  geometry is symmetric and loading is antisymmetric  we can model only half the body and impose antisymmetry BC on the displacement as below:
Antisymmetry BC
 
 
 

Pllane of 
Symm
  X          Y         Z       RX      RY      RZ 
X=0 F 0 0 0 F F
Y=0 0 F 0 F 0 F
Z=0 0 0 F F 0 F
 
 

F=> Free, RX,RY,RZ => rotations Notice ONLY out of plane motion allowed for any point on plane of symmetry.

St Venants Principle
The difference in stresses produced by two sets of statically equivalent forces acting on a surface of area A diminishes with distance from A and becomes
negligible at distances large compared to linear dimensions of A. Thus for the purposes of analysis it is often acceptable to replace complex boundary
condition with statically equivalent loads.

 
 


Abani Patra

Mon Mar 15 10:37:42 EST 1999